Discussion:
Palinism Beaten, Obamanation Next to Go
(too old to reply)
skins
2008-11-05 19:01:22 UTC
Permalink
PALINISM BEATEN, OBAMANATION NEXT TO GO

With the defeat of Sarah Palin and the Palin-plan to lavish $46
billion on the mentally-retarded, the issue of Eugenics, the science
of propagating the most fit and healthy offspring, comes to the fore.
Palin, who carried around her retarded baby, during her unsuccessful
quest for the Vice-Presidency, had promised to be an "advocate" for
others afflicted with Down's Syndrome children. Mental-retardation
advocacy-groups call for increased financial support for the defective.
Palin had campaigned strongly against abortions, which would curtail
the increase in fetuses found to be deformed in the womb. She, also,
supported birth of babies produced through rape and incest.

Retarded babies, such as Palin's, are likely produced from various
factors. One is from conceiving late in life, when a woman may no
longer safely carry a child to term, usually after age thirty-five.
Palin was forty-four. Another factor is hereditary congenital-disease,
in which retardation-genes are passed on. This is likely in Palin's case,
because Palin's sister, also, has an afflicted child. Retardation and
deformity can, also, be produced through inter-racial sexual-relations,
which can produce chromosomal-defects. Palin was married to an
Eskimo. Other factors can be drug and alcohol abuse, by the
mother, especially during pregnancy. Palin had admitted to being
a marijuana-user.

Throughout the history of America, curtailing the birth of deformed
babies has been a high priority. The United States Supreme Court has
sanctioned sterilization, as a means of preventing "imbeciles" from
being propagated. Most states have laws preventing the retarded from
voting, holding office or, even, taking part in any public-affairs.
Most declare them "incompetent" to marry or to handle their own
affairs and many require a guardian, to transact their business.
Under Palin's plan, the retarded would be given the vote, allowed to
marry and "mainstreamed" into public-schools. Normal children would
be compelled to "accept" the retarded and associate with them.

Under Eugenics, a couple would be required to have a health-exam. No
one could marry, who carried genes which produce retardation or other
congenital defect. Anyone knowingly producing defective children
would be committing a crime. Miscegenation would be outlawed, not
only to increase genetic but societal health. Drug-abuse and
drug-dealing would be severely punished and alcoholism stringently
discouraged. The retarded would be institutionalized, rather than
"mainstreamed," and such enterprises as the "Special-Olympics" to
"showcase" the retarded, would be abolished. Abortion, sterilization
and birth-control would be used for genetic-health.

Insofar as Negro-blood produces not only a high-degree of retardation
but a "dumbed-down" strain of offspring, Barack Obama cannot produce
the "highest and best" blood. Neither is he likely to encourage its
propagation. So, Eugenics will need to be implemented in government,
subsequent to the Obama-Administration. Meanwhile, according to Tyler
Hansen, "What we need to do is to start teaching our children to go
nowhere but up in the world, so that they can take control of the issue
and not allow problems to continue any further." Hansen condemned
both "Palinism" and "Obamanation," stating that "it is wrong in every
way and needs to be stopped, now. We must advance."

To unsubscribe from Skinlist:
http://www.skinheadz.com/contact/unsubscribe.php

To subscribe to Skinlist:
http://www.skinheadz.com/contact/subscribe.php

To comment on Skinlist:
http://www.skinheadz.com/contact/comment.php

To read this article on the Skinhead website:
http://www.skinheadz.com/docs/ideology/2008/110501.html

Skinlist
Trademark/service of skinheadz.com
Not necessarily Skinlist views
Copyright 2008 Skinheadz
McCant
2008-11-06 20:59:46 UTC
Permalink
Your mentality is near that of a damn caveman. You are well below the
mentality of a retard.
Post by skins
PALINISM BEATEN, OBAMANATION NEXT TO GO
With the defeat of Sarah Palin and the Palin-plan to lavish $46
billion on the mentally-retarded, the issue of Eugenics, the science
of propagating the most fit and healthy offspring, comes to the fore.
Palin, who carried around her retarded baby, during her unsuccessful
quest for the Vice-Presidency, had promised to be an "advocate" for
others afflicted with Down's Syndrome children. Mental-retardation
advocacy-groups call for increased financial support for the defective.
Palin had campaigned strongly against abortions, which would curtail
the increase in fetuses found to be deformed in the womb. She, also,
supported birth of babies produced through rape and incest.
Retarded babies, such as Palin's, are likely produced from various
factors. One is from conceiving late in life, when a woman may no
longer safely carry a child to term, usually after age thirty-five.
Palin was forty-four. Another factor is hereditary congenital-disease,
in which retardation-genes are passed on. This is likely in Palin's case,
because Palin's sister, also, has an afflicted child. Retardation and
deformity can, also, be produced through inter-racial sexual-relations,
which can produce chromosomal-defects. Palin was married to an
Eskimo. Other factors can be drug and alcohol abuse, by the
mother, especially during pregnancy. Palin had admitted to being
a marijuana-user.
Throughout the history of America, curtailing the birth of deformed
babies has been a high priority. The United States Supreme Court has
sanctioned sterilization, as a means of preventing "imbeciles" from
being propagated. Most states have laws preventing the retarded from
voting, holding office or, even, taking part in any public-affairs.
Most declare them "incompetent" to marry or to handle their own
affairs and many require a guardian, to transact their business.
Under Palin's plan, the retarded would be given the vote, allowed to
marry and "mainstreamed" into public-schools. Normal children would
be compelled to "accept" the retarded and associate with them.
Under Eugenics, a couple would be required to have a health-exam. No
one could marry, who carried genes which produce retardation or other
congenital defect. Anyone knowingly producing defective children
would be committing a crime. Miscegenation would be outlawed, not
only to increase genetic but societal health. Drug-abuse and
drug-dealing would be severely punished and alcoholism stringently
discouraged. The retarded would be institutionalized, rather than
"mainstreamed," and such enterprises as the "Special-Olympics" to
"showcase" the retarded, would be abolished. Abortion, sterilization
and birth-control would be used for genetic-health.
Insofar as Negro-blood produces not only a high-degree of retardation
but a "dumbed-down" strain of offspring, Barack Obama cannot produce
the "highest and best" blood. Neither is he likely to encourage its
propagation. So, Eugenics will need to be implemented in government,
subsequent to the Obama-Administration. Meanwhile, according to Tyler
Hansen, "What we need to do is to start teaching our children to go
nowhere but up in the world, so that they can take control of the issue
and not allow problems to continue any further." Hansen condemned
both "Palinism" and "Obamanation," stating that "it is wrong in every
way and needs to be stopped, now. We must advance."
http://www.skinheadz.com/contact/unsubscribe.php
http://www.skinheadz.com/contact/subscribe.php
http://www.skinheadz.com/contact/comment.php
http://www.skinheadz.com/docs/ideology/2008/110501.html
Skinlist
Trademark/service of skinheadz.com
Not necessarily Skinlist views
Copyright 2008 Skinheadz
Andrew Halliwell
2008-11-08 17:35:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by McCant
Your mentality is near that of a damn caveman. You are well below the
mentality of a retard.
Indeed, he must've been reading the nazi manifesto or something.
Genetic defects? Who judges what is a "congenital defect" in this brave new
world? Who knows what benefits some of these "defects" may imbue in a
person? Just because it might have nasty side effects when dominant doesn't
mean a latent gene won't have some beneficial side effect.

Case in point: sickle cell anemia.
1 chromosomes with the defect = increased resistance to maleria
2 chromosomes (one from each parent) = sickle cell anemia

Should someone with sickle cell anemia be banned from marrage?
No. Because he has an equal chance of producing a child with the disease as
a healthy person with the gene has.

Eugenics was discredited decades ago and yet good old skinheadz (bonehead)
idiocy still proposes it.
--
| ***@freenet.co.uk | |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" |
| in | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! |
| Computer Science | - Father Jack in "Father Ted" |
Loading...